Well, so much for the solidarity of the media standing up to Islamic Terror threats. The New York Times chose to edit out eyewitness report on the Terrorists telling one woman, Sigolene Vinson, they would not kill her "I’m not going to kill you because you’re a woman, we don’t kill women, but you must convert to Islam, read the Quran and cover yourself" Instead the Times edited to say that since you are a woman we will not kill you but think about what your doing it's not right. Amazing, despite all the barbaric killing the NYT tries to cover-up the true reason these people murder. They believe you become a Muslim or you should be killed.
The New York Times and many mainstream media outlets will not even show the comics that led to the murders in Paris. Why? they don't want to inflame the Muslim community. If I recall they did not have an issue about posting the picture of Abu Grahib that inflamed the Muslim community. Some will say these are different issues. They are, one was a way to attack an American President and portray he and the military in a bad light, which fits their political narrative. The NYT and some of their liberal media brethren do not want to accurately report the ongoing battle against the evil that that is the rogue elements of Islam. As I have mentioned before, the New York Times has not problem offending Christians by showing pictures of "Piss Christ" and supporting free speech.
We have Eugene Robinson, liberal columnist, claiming how much worse these terror attacks would be in the United State because guns were accessible. Really, how did the gun control work in France. How about those officers that were murdered, do you think maybe they would have liked to have a gun to defend themselves? We also have many in the media worrying that these actions will cause a violent backlash by Islamophobes. Never mind that despite all these terror attacks by Islamic Terrorists, people have not gone out and murdered Muslims for their faith yelling "Jesus Christ is Lord" or "Jehovah is God".
Our President and his administration will not call out these terrorists as Islamic Terrorists. Why , good question, the only reason they are so supportive of the Islam faith that they will not call out their rogue elements. Ben Stein points out even yesterday their concern or goal was not to go after Islamic Terrorists. No, their goal was to insure there was no retaliation by Islamophobic groups.
Finally, have you noticed the media has not asked President Obama about his bold statement from May 2013, "The Global War on Terror is over". I guess the Terrorists didn't read that one!
The New York Times and many mainstream media outlets will not even show the comics that led to the murders in Paris. Why? they don't want to inflame the Muslim community. If I recall they did not have an issue about posting the picture of Abu Grahib that inflamed the Muslim community. Some will say these are different issues. They are, one was a way to attack an American President and portray he and the military in a bad light, which fits their political narrative. The NYT and some of their liberal media brethren do not want to accurately report the ongoing battle against the evil that that is the rogue elements of Islam. As I have mentioned before, the New York Times has not problem offending Christians by showing pictures of "Piss Christ" and supporting free speech.
We have Eugene Robinson, liberal columnist, claiming how much worse these terror attacks would be in the United State because guns were accessible. Really, how did the gun control work in France. How about those officers that were murdered, do you think maybe they would have liked to have a gun to defend themselves? We also have many in the media worrying that these actions will cause a violent backlash by Islamophobes. Never mind that despite all these terror attacks by Islamic Terrorists, people have not gone out and murdered Muslims for their faith yelling "Jesus Christ is Lord" or "Jehovah is God".
Our President and his administration will not call out these terrorists as Islamic Terrorists. Why , good question, the only reason they are so supportive of the Islam faith that they will not call out their rogue elements. Ben Stein points out even yesterday their concern or goal was not to go after Islamic Terrorists. No, their goal was to insure there was no retaliation by Islamophobic groups.
Finally, have you noticed the media has not asked President Obama about his bold statement from May 2013, "The Global War on Terror is over". I guess the Terrorists didn't read that one!